Fan Theories That Turn Regular Movies Into Horror Movies

Just watching a movie and enjoying it is so yesterday. These days, film appreciation is a much more participatory event in which you're encouraged to devise your own solutions to plot holes, your own interpretation of events and endings, and even your own theories concerning what you just watched. Fan theories have become commonplace, in fact, and some of these theories are brilliant fun (imagining James Bond as a regenerating Time Lord like Doctor Who to explain all the different actors who've played him, for example). 

But with great power comes great responsibility. The fan theory has the power to not only amuse and fascinate but to actually transform a film, to so completely reinterpret it as to move it into an entirely new genre. For example, the fan theories on this list do so much more than just offer a fun idea or extend your enjoyment of a great film. These theories actually transform their subject films from comedies, romances, or musicals into bone-chilling horror movies. The best (worst) part? They're so fiendishly clever and work so well that you won't ever be able to think of these movies the same way again.

The original film adaptation of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a beloved classic (the 2005 Johnny Depp remake, not so much). This is largely due to the deranged but brilliant performance of Gene Wilder, who was at the height of his off-center comedic powers in 1971 ... but it's also due to the dark tone of the film. Seriously, this G-rated movie is full of disturbing moments. The story makes little effort to redeem the transparently awful children who tour Wonka's magical candy factory, making you cheer when the kids are variously sucked into chocolate sauce plumbing, turned into blueberries, or shrunk to microscopic size. Of course, in reality, those events would be horrifying (and in reality, a guy like Willy Wonka wouldn't be allowed within 50 feet of children), but while the movie is freaky enough, we can make it even freakier with a bit of pure imagination. 

So you want to turn this dark comedy into a horror film? What if these kids were dead, and they were being taken through the circles of Dante's Hell and deposited in their proper place? Well, according to Uproxx (via Buzzfeed), there's a fan theory that does just that, explaining the parallels between Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and the classic poem The Inferno by Dante, in which Hell is divided into nine 'circles' where different kinds of damned souls reside. Short version? The factory is Hell, and Wonka is Charon, the ferryman taking a batch of newly dead kids on a tour and depositing them in the correct circle based on their fundamental sin.

If you've ever been near a child in the last few years, you're at least tangentially familiar with the animated film Cars, set in a world of talking automobiles. It's a breezy, child-friendly fantasy that has launched a goldmine in tie-in merchandise, not to mention several sequels. But several people, including writer Jason Torchinsky of Jalopnik, have noticed some details that turn this PG-rated romp into a terrifying post-apocalyptic story certain to scar you for life. 

So what's the proof that the Cars franchise is set in post-human wasteland? Well, the cars all retain vestigial evidence of a vanished human race. For example, rear-view mirrors and door handles wouldn't be necessary if there'd never been any humans. Another creepy detail is the fact that all the cars speak human languages and have cultures based on human cultures. The theory speculates that the cars are actually descended from today's increasingly sophisticated, self-driving cars. At some point, they attained sentience, and the humans either died off ... or were purged. By the cars, if we're not being clear. Torchinsky then takes this theory one step further into horror territory by suggesting that maybe there are humans in the Cars universe — embedded inside the vehicles and providing their personalities and voices. 

The Big Lebowski is brilliant, and the Dude as portrayed by Jeff Bridges has become one of the most enduringly popular characters of modern times (he's actually the smartest guy in the movie, if you think about it). But the character that inspired the fan theory that turns it into a full-on horror movie is Donny, Walter's meek bowling buddy played by Steve Buscemi. As explained by The Nerdist, the theory proposes that Donny — constantly abused and screamed at by Walter (John Goodman) — is actually a figment of Walter's guilt- and grief-ridden imagination. In fact, it's possible that Donny was Walter's war buddy from back in Vietnam ... a war buddy who never came home.

Need more proof? The ashes that Walter and the Dude try (and hilariously fail) to scatter at the end of the film are Donny's remains that Walter brought back from 'Nam. He's been processing his PTSD ever since, carrying the ashes around and screaming at a ghost only he can see, and his friends all pretend not to notice, or they're truly unaware that Walter's outbursts aren't simply directed at them. Suddenly, this is the story of a man broken by his experience during the war, struggling to piece his sanity back together while being literally haunted. And Donny's dopey, smiling visage becomes something intensely sinister when viewed through the lens of Walter's disintegrating mental state.

Fight Club is a pretty dark movie to begin with, although it has a happy-ish ending if you squint. To turn it a few shades darker and spin it directly into horror territory, just add some Calvin and Hobbes, the classic comic by Bill Watterson about a hyperactive kid and his stuffed toy tiger and the imaginary adventures they have. All you have to do, as Slash Film explains, is imagine that Calvin grew up to become a socially isolated, emotionally destroyed man — the unnamed Narrator of Fight Club. His toy tiger, Hobbes, is long gone, but Calvin still retains his lively, overactive imagination. When he shifts into full-on crisis mode, he falls back on his old habit of inventing a bad influence/best friend — this time a washboard-abbed Brad Pitt type named Tyler Durden. 

Only instead of imagining himself as Spaceman Spiff, establishing the seminal men's organization GROSS (Get Rid of Slimy Girls), and making grotesque snowmen, Calvin now punches his imaginary friend in the face, and the two discuss the philosophy of masculinity and plot the downfall of civilization. What really makes this a horror story is how it traces the slow decline of Calvin from a bright, happy child into an unstable, violent terrorist, making you wonder what exactly happened to the guy — and if the reason he spent his childhood pretending his stuffed tiger was alive was because he was burying some horrifying trauma.

Roald Dahl brought a deep vein of darkness to many of his children's stories, and Matilda is no exception. And the same goes for the 1996 movie. In the film, Matilda's parents treat her horribly, and headmistress Miss Trunchbull tortures the students and then gaslights them with insane punishments their parents don't believe are real. The only source of comfort for Matilda is her teacher, Miss Honey, who's also a victim of Trunchbull's malice. Matilda is able to get her revenge when she develops the power of telekinesis, which she uses to torture and gaslight Miss Trunchbull, driving her away. 

So yeah, it's disturbing, but where's the horror movie? Well, according to Screen Geek, there's a fan theory that turns this into a horror prequel. What if Matilda and her adoptive mother, Miss Honey, move to New England, where Miss Honey's years of poverty and suffering curdle into a religious mania? And in order to escape their pasts, they change their name to White, and Matilda retreats into books and her own imagination as her home life descends into something darker than before. And just as Matilda's powers emerged just when she needed them in childhood, they emerge again when she reaches a breaking point in high school — except this time there's a much higher body count. Yeah, we're thinking Matilda is a set-up for Carrie, which definitely makes the kids' film even more disturbing.

The Shawshank Redemption is a great movie about a wrongfully accused man who maintains his dignity and compassion despite years of abuse and confinement at the hands of a corrupt warden ... or it's the dark story of a master manipulator who murders several people, brainwashes his fellow inmates, destroys several lives, and vanishes into the wind like Keyser Soze. Does Red survive his reunion with Andy Dufresne, or is he murdered the moment the screen cuts to black? 

According to Inverse, there's one fan theory out there that definitely assumes the latter. The theory rests on the fact that everything we know about Andy's actions, motives, and thoughts is told to us by Red, the narrator. So if Andy lies to Red and fools him, how would we know? If you watch the film with the idea that Andy is a coldly calculating sociopath, everything comes together. This is a man who spends decades plotting an escape that brilliantly takes down everyone who's treated him badly, a man who effortlessly creates a false identity — while stuck in prison — and successfully tricks the warden into trusting him. He's a killer. All we're lacking is the scene where Verbal Kint loses his limp.